Alexander Melman: And what Malakhov?

Anonim

This is a question primarily to Andrei himself. If he gave an installation on the second, no one is decree. So, there were good reasons. However, for some reason I do not want to repeat the entire "nightmare" of one year old prescription. We look at the picture.

Externally did not change at all, everything is also Elegance, will shave, fresh. All the same slightly appreciated, slightly stuttering and already a challenged voice. The same format ... But the context turned out to be completely different.

The point here is not only in Prime Time, which Andrei lost: after all, 18.00 is not at all 20.00, and this explains a lot. No, the inquisitive pensioners of an indefinite age are all along the becks, in the sense of chairs, sit, watch: from Malakhov to Borisov one step. But here is the working class of female sex Andrei Taki lost - a fact, for not every bird will take after work until its magic box for a six-evening.

However, now I will contradict myself a little. Not about the female field speech. Rather, not only about him. Here you are my observations from nature. Somehow I turned out to be in the apartment of a wonderful artist and the beautiful director of Nikolai Nikolayevich Gubenko. No, we got acquainted with Gajnko, but I came to the appearance to meet with his beautiful wife Zhanna Bolotov. We sat, talked for souls ... Nikolayevich comes here. Suddenly, I feel, I feel some tension from your interlocutors, even a little irritation, they began to distortion about something. A minute later it became clear about what ... Jeanne pressed the button, the blue screen turned on and the Andrei Malakhov was formed there. The great acting couple appealed to one continuous attention, in the most grateful spectators. He and she sat not lying and lick her idol. Imagine?

I can't imagine, but it was. And Andrei soft (Andrey himself is soft!) When Malakhov came to him, was just on the seventh heaven from happiness. And Valentin Gaft, and the Lion of Durov, Light Memory, - everything, as one, was explained by Andryusha in great and clean love. However, it was even when he worked on the first.

And what about the second, on "Russia"? In my opinion, as in due time Maxim Galkin, he was lost there, well, just like in the forest. Dissolved, became an average arithmetic, background. For some reason, the "entertainment" on this channel is difficult, basically. Yes, this is not their chip, so it happened. They are the masters of the political genre, we do not take away. Serial-melodramatic so that all grandmothers do without exception tears drip out. But with the entertainment trouble.

Malakhov did not change, just put him in the wrong entourage, context. It seems that he also works professionally, as before, but something is missing ... Here the vulgarity from me will not wait. Just a bird sorry. In the sense of very talented Andryusha, one of the best leading on our TV.

Read more