The scandal worked out after the release of the film "Text", where the actress and part-time Wife of the Showman Garik Harlamov Christina Asmus starred in frank scenes, gains momentum. Film "treason" beloved gossip deftly projects for real life.
The pressure on the side of haters may have added degrees to the relationship of star spouses: who is nice when every day it is unambiguous to understand that "smoke without fire does not happen? Here who wants the horns on the head will make the head - even non-existent.
However, Garik turned out to be a man wise, courageous and morally stable. He clearly identified his position, stating the general public that he was sincerely sorry for those who were so superficially perceived the work of the director and actors. Garik is confident that Christina approached work as a real professional. And although the scene itself, which is called, on the verge of a foul, he, even as a husband, does not see anything reprehensible in it.
I as a psychologist think that this is a very hard test for the fortress of married relations. Many often ask a question - how and why this in principle happened? In my opinion, just here everything is clear: anyone knows that the frankness and even in some cases the transition of generally accepted borders is increasingly becoming a guarantor of cash raises. It is not excluded that this also turned out to be an attractive factor for a young attractive woman. Christina was fascinated by a new manner for her, and a man is difficult to respond normally to such escapades.
Alena Al-Ace
It is clear that the movie is movies. And what's the point in this case, ask questions like "What do they allow themselves?!" However, greedy to sensations in the streets transfer seen into reality, automatically turning a happy family man in an offended cuckold.
How to treat similar features of professional activity of your narrowed / narrowed? I think that such provocative things need to be discussed - which is permissible in your case, and what - by no means. Here everyone decides himself.
But there is another curious and very widespread moment. At first, you can play family democracy ("Dear, we are both civilized people"), to say the second half: "Well, yes, do what you want," - with the assumption that the partner will refuse.
And he take and agree to joy. A lot of excuses find a lot of excuses - they say, the sexy scene is spelled out in the book, it is vital for the storyline and in general, "I am an artist, I see." And even if it really doesn't seem terrible, it later knocks out of the gauge. As they say, the precipitate remained. This, I repeat, a very tough test for the fortress of relationships, on life wisdom, especially in a situation where society is clearly not ready to adequately perceive such creative experiments. Menchov and Aylenta was not unlabohed in the 70s for the film "Moscow does not believe in tears" - and after all, just alente breast in the frame showed, and by the will of the spouse director himself.
Separately, it is worth saying that, according to the frank recognition of the actress itself, these shooting did not help her to become liberated. Christina Asmus stated that with her enough bed scenes. She does not plan further to appear in front of the viewer in such an intimate form and even thinks about refusing to appear in underwear, although the contract for such shooting has already been signed. It only remains to guess that this is a sincere decision not only actresses, but also the mother of the family, or the result of the carefully hidden psychotrauma of the head of the Garik Bulldog Harlamov.